X-Rays for Cancer? When a scan is a scam

X-Rays for Cancer? When a scan is a scam

So when my Oncologist tells me that my brain is “excellent”, I decide to take that as a compliment to my intelligence.  Why not, it’s not every day anyone says something quite so flattering but, of course, he wasn’t referring to my intelligence.  He was thinking of it from a purely professional perspective and his profession is that of a doctor.  As a doctor he was referring to the lack of shrinkage or other signs of age-related deterioration but it was nevertheless very comforting when he described how many of his patients’ scans appear, by comparison.  The general review was part of the reason he was feeling so positive but most of all he was focussed on the speck, for that’s all it was, that was the remnant of my three year old tumour.  The precise definition of a speck was, apparently, 0.018cc.  As I said, a speck.  A pea, for the purposes of comparison, is approximately 0.20 cc in size whereas this white fleck on the monotone picture in front of us was nearer that of a mustard seed, though not quite as uniform given that mine is made up of the jagged remains of a dead alien lifeform.  Regardless, the point is that whatever the precise size of the speck, three years down the road what we can say for certain is that the tumour is dead, gone, finished, finito and that, quite frankly, is amazing both technologically and emotionally.

I’ve got used to Connor over the years so I know that good news always comes first and the more difficult stuff is pushed further down the queue. This in spite of the fact that he was emphatically instructed on that very first day that I only take good news, so good news is all he’s allowed to deliver. For the most part he complies but on occasion he has little choice but to tell the truth. One such day was the one where he reviewed my thoracic CT scan and spent some time sharing the good news. My right lung may have said goodbye to one half of its former substance but, aside from the obvious scars of emphysema he focussed on the lack of any new lesions (tumours) and the fact that the remaining tissue had expanded fully to become the same size as the original whole lung, yay! Then his demeanour changed for the worse as he prepared to show me the second CT, the one I had asked for of my head and neck. I couldn’t say for sure why I asked for it, I think I was fearing Oesophogeal cancer, following the departure from this mortal coil of the wonderful Christopher Hitchens courtesy of that very thing. Whatever the trigger for it, it turned out to be the best call I’ve ever made in my life even though that wasn’t how it felt in that moment as Connor announced that the 21mm diameter spherical object in the centre of my skull was not supposed to be there. It was so perfectly formed and so centrally aligned that it looked as if it belonged. It didn’t. Not a brain tumour, per se but rather a lung cancer tumour in my brain, one that likely grew from a single, solitary cell that found its way into this cosy, protected womb and decided to set up home and raise a family of other little cells just as all living things are wont to do when good circumstances such as this contrive to provide a protective, nurturing environment. My worst nightmare.

A recent article from Yale University  states: “Most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has metastasized to the brain have a dire prognosis.” It goes on: “NSCLC accounts for 85% of all lung cancers, with 30%–50% of patients developing metastatic disease to the brain. Typically, patients with this diagnosis die of the disease within seven months.” So, yes, I do feel lucky but it’s a relative term, I assure you. What the article doesn’t mention is the benefit of Gamma Knife treatment to destroy these critters incredibly effectively so I’ve written to them to tell them of their oversight. The other thing this article and most medical practice overlooks is that if 30-50% of lung cancer patients develop a metastasis in the brain, why isn’t a follow-up MRI of the head a de facto part of the standard treatment plan. Oh, that’s right, it costs a little money….and I suppose that if general wisdom is that the prognosis is “dire” and the average life span just “seven months”, then why bother?

NSCLC

So, when the focus this time was all about the good news evidenced by the MRI of my brain, my natural caution had me, well, trepidacious of the prospect of reviewing my thoracic CT. I needn’t have worried. The news there was every bit as wonderful. Given that my whole body PET-CT, just six months ago, was all clear there were no rational grounds for my concern but when you’ve trodden this path a while you come to recognise that the brain, even one in excellent condition, doesn’t always obey the entirely rational when it comes to the fear created by cancer. So, three years for my brain, four years for my lungs, that’s almost a clean bill of health and, whether it is or not, that’s the way I chose to interpret it. As Connor said, nothing’s changed, Robin. You still have the same DNA, the same physiology. In short, all the same circumstances that attracted the alien in the first place and if another passing alien happens along there’s nothing to say it won’t choose to stop over and stay a while. That’s the reality. Sure, the fact that I’ve since stopped smoking must help, but the previous fifty years of inhaling carcinogens have already had their effect on my cell structures in such a way as to open them up to the possibility of mutation into alien form. My fault entirely but that doesn’t lessen the impact, believe me.

So there it is, I’m healthy from head to toe. I’m sort of happy about that, relieved. So why no euphoria? Difficult to say, everything about this whole journey is difficult to describe, emotionally. It’s literally life-changing, obviously but ever so confusing.

And while I’m getting my good news, my lovely friend and Irish earth mother/grandmother/wife of my good friend is recovering in ICU in Ireland following a full pneumonectomy. That’s a whole lung removal as opposed to my lobectomy. In some respects she’s in exactly the same boat as me. A life-long smoker, approximately the same age and with the exact same type of non-small-cell carcinoma in her right lung. The difference, mine was Stage II, hers Stage III. Hers was once Stage II of course and her experience could have been the same as mine but for the criminal failures of her consultant and GP. She presented in June 2015 having had a sequence of chest infections, one a month for several months, which had not responded to antibiotics. That’s about item #1 or #2 on the list of top ten symptoms of lung cancer. So, what does the consultant do? He orders an xray. Now, for those who aren’t familiar with all this medical technicality, here’s the thing. Some tumours show on an xray, many don’t. So if, like me, it shows then you’re sure of the diagnosis and you get on with it. If you’re like my friend and nothing shows on the xray there is only one thing you can deduce and that is that you know no more following the xray than you did before and so you need a CT scan. But there is always the other option, I suppose. You could be a dumb, lazy, negligent twit who’s in the wrong job and you could just deduce that because my friend was a smoker and you have no evidence of cancer then, well, it must be emphysema, right?  (COPD as it’s now defined). No need to rush now, just advise the patient to give up smoking and Bob’s your uncle. Or, as is much more likely, your Stage II/III tumour turns into Stage III/IV as it did for my friend. I told Connor about it. He shook his head and gritted his teeth. He sees it at least once, often twice a week, every week. A patient presents with clear symptoms that could indicate lung cancer and off they go for the xray. That’s fine as a cost saving exercise if you assume that 60% of cancers will show up on the xray thus saving the cost of a CT but against that has to be set the additional cost of sending every one who has a clear xray for a secondary scan by CT in order to rule out the inability of xrays to show many tumours. These people have to get with the programme and if someone is presenting with symptoms then get them to a CT straight away. That way there’s no guesswork, there’s no ifs, buts or maybes. Whatever you do, you don’t let your own prejudices get in the way of your diagnosis and, if the xray is clear then, AS A MATTER OF ROUTINE, you go for a CT without hesitation. Why does it matter? It’s simple really. My Stage II tumour, precisely because it was Stage II, was a nicely behaved alien keeping itself to itself and once removed by the lobectomy left me with no need for chemotherapy given there was no metastasis and the tumour had not spread to the lymph system. Give it a further six months to gestate and you get yourself a Stage III tumour which might well metastasise, though my friend’s hasn’t, or it’ll grow until it takes in a lymph node, as hers has. Now you need chemotherapy, for sure, and the chances of a full all clear are greatly reduced – not entirely, she has a very good chance with the chemo of making a full recovery but if she does, it’ll be no thanks to her negligent doctors. Six months after that xray, my friend starts coughing blood. That’s the Stage III, right there and it should never have happened, damn them.

So there I am digesting the complicated and confusing news that I might just live forever, or thereabouts, whilst worrying about my friend who has a terrifying ride ahead of her with no guarantee as to outcome. A bit like survivor guilt, I guess. I just want her and everyone else to have the quality of care and the luck that I’ve had. You can’t distribute luck fairly but you can damn well make sure that everyone gets the same quality of care. Unfortunately the Irish health service is not even as good as the British NHS, and that’s bad enough in this respect, but there’s is some years behind that and, consequently, patients will pay with their lives. If one person reads this, patient or doctor and acts accordingly, I’ll have lived my extra years for good reason.

Advertisements

Mother Teresa. Hell’s Angel or ‘Saint’

So she got her promised desserts.  Like the soldiers of any organised crime family, you can rest assured that your loyal service will be rewarded upon your death.  The BBC carries the article and writes, without a hint of irony: “Pope Francis has recognised a second miracle attributed to Mother Teresa, clearing the way for the Roman Catholic nun to be declared a saint next year.”

mtWhilst she didn’t administer much in the way of medicine to her own charges, she did, it seems, accept that medicine is what cures disease, rather than even her version of hocus pocus. Indeed, she was no great fan of either, curing wasn’t her thing, packing them up on their way to meet their god was her thing.

So it is strange that this miraculous cure of brain cancer is the foundation of the second miracle that assures her canonisation.   All the BBC can tell us is that “There are few details about the recovery of the Brazilian man, whose life the Vatican says was saved in the second miracle.”.  John of GodI concur, I’ve searched high and low but if my reader would like a good laugh amongst tears shed for abuse of the innocent, try this one about John of God but don’t omit reading “The
update” at the end.  If there is to be legislation banning proselytism of terror, could this web site please go on that list?

There is a near bottomless well of texts from the late, great Christopher Hitchens from which to draw, one for almost any purpose, in any context, so long as that context is a challenge to or comment on concepts of logic or reason.  That well contains the most pointed and prosaic quotations but there is one that I believe trumps all: “..extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence..”

In the way of cruel facts, it is a fact that the one person who bothered to tell the real story of the Albanian egotist and fundamentalist fanatic died four years ago, almost on the anniversary of this “saintly event”.  It’s as if the Pope was having a Pop.  In this wonderful reprint of his essay, Christopher tells his thoughts on the news that “Pope Francis will make Mother Teresa — a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud—a saint.”  and if you’d like to see more of how he came to that conclusion I’d suggest you gird your loins and hang on to your stomach before watching his documentary on the woman in whose company despots and criminals loved to be seen and whose ill-gotten gains she was only too happy to take, not to help the poor and suffering but to expand her egoist empire, promulgating her evil voodoo on those same illiterate poor and indeed suffering masses.

As one who has experienced their own personal journey, the subject of miracles in Brazil, I can tell you that the few that are cured owe more to StarWars than to voodoo, Catholic or otherwise.  If there is praise to be offered here, we should worship the Nerd.  Nerds will be our salvation and already often are.  Hail to the Nerd.  Praise him.  Oh, god, I’ve gone and started one myself now haven’t I !  So easy to slip into established patterns even when you think you’re above it all.  Here endeth that particular lesson.

A modern Altar, perhaps?  gk

A bold logo?                                           Our very own saint, Prof Lars Leksell

Karolinska InstitutetProf Lars Leksell

 

hmm…Nerdism…I wonder…..No.

Stop!